Plan to silence Big Ben's bongs 'under review' say Commons chiefs

1 London

London News & Search

1 News - 1 eMovies - 1 eMusic - 1 eBooks - 1 Search

Commons chiefs are to review whether Big Ben’s bongs should be silenced for up to four years for renovation work.

They announced that they would reconsider the plan, based on health and safety concerns to protect workers’ hearing, after it was criticised by Theresa May and a string of MPs.

The Prime Minister said this morning: “It can’t be right for Big Ben to be silent for four years.”

She called on Commons Speaker John Bercow to urgently review the controversial decision.

A House of Commons spokeswoman said: “When Parliament returns, in light of concerns expressed by a number of MPs, the House of Commons Commission will consider the length of time that the bells will fall silent. 

“Of course, any discussion will focus on undertaking the work efficiently, protecting the health and safety of those involved, and seeking to ensure resumption of normal service as soon as is practicable given those requirements.”

The Commission, which is chaired by Mr Bercow, is likely to consider whether Big Ben could continue ringing outside of working hours or whether the bell could be silenced for less than four years.

However, the Commons authorities stressed that the Elizabeth Tower conservation project was agreed by the Commons Administration Committee, the Lords Administration and Works Committee, and the Commons Finance Committee at the end of 2015.

They added that starting and stopping Big Ben is a “complex and lengthy process”. 

Big Ben: The famous landmark was due to fall silent for four years (EPA)

The striking hammer is locked and the bells disconnected from the clock mechanism, before the weights are lowered to the base of the tower and secured in a safe position.

“The whole process takes around half a day to complete,” added the spokeswoman.

“Following a thorough assessment, experts have concluded that it would not be practical or a good use of public money to start and stop the bells each day, particularly as we cannot fully predict the times that staff will be working on this project.”

They are likely to consider whether Big Ben could continue ringing outside of working hours or whether the bell could be silenced for less than four years.

The bell, which has marked the hour with almost unbroken service for the past 157 years, is due to sound for the last time on the hour at noon next Monday until the renovation of the tower is completed in 2021.

But during a visit to Portsmouth, Mrs May said: “Of course we want to ensure people’s safety at work but it can’t be right for Big Ben to be silent for four years.

“And I hope that the Speaker, as the chairman of the House of Commons commission, will look into this urgently so that we can ensure that we can continue to hear Big Ben through those four years.”

Brexit Secretary David Davis yesterday branded stopping the chimes as “mad” and urged the estate’s authorities to “just get on” with the renovation work.

The move was also labelled “entirely bonkers” by Conservative MP James Gray who sat on the administration committee which first approved the work.

Parliamentary officials defended the plan, insisting workers’ hearing could be put at “serious risk” and warned that those using the 100 metre high scaffolding around the tower could also be startled by the 118 decibel bongs.

But MPs have asked officials to look at the cost and practical implications of ringing the Great Bell more often than the current plan to put it back into use just for special occasions, such as New Year’s Eve.

Liberal Democrat Tom Brake has contacted Ian Ailles, House of Commons director general, calling for the review of the plans to be carried out.

Mr Brake, who answers questions from MPs on behalf of the Commons Commission, said: “I have asked whether someone can do some work working out what the costings and the practicality of ringing them more frequently would be.

“It would not be possible for them to continue to be rung every 15 minutes as is currently the case, that would not be practical, but it may be perhaps practical and it may be financially viable to ring them more frequently than is currently being proposed.”

Senior MPs also claimed they had been kept in the dark about the controverial proposals.

More and more parliamentarians today spoke out against the move to turn off the bells for health and safety reasons.

Senior backbench Tory MP Nigel Evans accepted measures had to be taken to protect the hearing of workers doing the restoration work.

But he called for “imaginative, out-of-the-box ideas” to allow the bells to carry on tolling certainly at some times during the day.

“Why can’t they switch the bells back on when they stop working at 5pm or 6pm or whenever it is? Also why is it taking four years?”

He even suggested a recording of the bongs could be sounded out from Parliament’s Victoria Tower.

Conservative MP Robert Halfon said: “Great chimes of Big Ben stopped 4 years at stroke of bureaucrats pen. Wrong decision. Iconic to Parliament.”

Former Labour Cabinet minister Lord Adonis tweeted: “4 yrs to repair Big Ben?! We could have left the EU twice in that time.”

1 London

London News & Search

1 News - 1 eMovies - 1 eMusic - 1 eBooks - 1 Search



Leave a Reply